But, while in abject poverty, she is destined to be worried eternally. Guy de Maupassant describes her psyche at this moment in graphic terms. From a literary angle, the main condition developing from all the movements and experiences she makes during and after the party represents paradox.
However, readers may realize that her failure to take responsibility for her actions is the flaw that leads to her fall.
Here one thing should be remembered that in the most important element to discover the effect that economic standing has on the characters. But she does not care for him, because he is poor.
The distress she experiences here adds even more to the paradox in her feelings. People today believe that inanimate objects make them more presentable or they see it as a confidence builder.
His generosity signified in his gesture of taking her to the party after making all such sacrifices becomes even clearer from the way in which he spends his time there. Once he gets to know about the expenses that it would incur, he does not withdraw from his offer to take her there. She makes it seem as though it was real in order to make her place in society better.
So she makes a hasty escape. Here we see how the society get divided into two different classes on the basis of the means of production. So she makes a hasty escape. The look of wealth was fake and so was the necklace but just by the way it looked it gave her power. When viewing a literary work from the point of view of the Marxist strategy, one considers the literature from all the aspects of economics.
It had separated her from her natural society and has turned her into a misfit in conflict with her own family and environment. As a reason for not being able to show up for such a length of time, Madame Loisel relates the story of the lost necklace.
She impatiently complains about her not having a proper dress to wear for the occasion. This always makes her feel repulsion about living in her own situation.
This short story, The Necklace, mirrors his understanding of the French society of his time.
Maupassant does not blame his heroine but the society as a whole.Guy de Maupassant put together a well written short story. He used two effective literary terms.
He used conflict to support the plot and situational irony to make plot twists that gave the story dynamics. Following his service in the Franco-Prussian War ofGuy de Maupassant studied with the seminal French writer Gustave Flaubert.
From Flaubert, de Maupassant learned that his job as a. The Necklace Guy De Maupassant Literary Criticism. Guy de Maupassant has a dark humor and likes to see Mathilde and her husband struggle. In The Necklace a women named Mathilde is lended a diamond necklace for a ball by a women named Madame Forestier.
Guy de Maupassant revolutionized the short story over the brief span of his literary career, which barely surmounted a decade. In addition to masterworks like “Boule de Suif,” Maupassant achieved renown as the witty creator of stories like “The Necklace,” which relies upon a surprise twist for its impact.
by Guy de Maupassant In the classic short story The Necklace, the main character Mathilde loses a borrowed necklace and spends the next ten years of her life paying loans for a agronumericus.com ironic twist occurs at the end when the friend who lent her the necklace in the first place reveals that it.
Literary Analysis Paper “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant In the short story “The Necklace” the author uses the literary element symbolism. People today believe that inanimate objects make them more presentable or they see it as a confidence builder%(1).Download